|
Algerians Without Oil: A Lesson
for the Gulf States
by Abdelaziz Testas, Ph.D.
A
common pitfall in Algerian politics is the belief that the country
has progressed because of vast oil reserves. Economic theory,
however, as I have shown elsewhere, tells the opposite: Algeria
has stagnated for many years because it has long depended on oil
proceeds for its economic development. To shed more light on the
pitfalls of Algeria's 'oil-only' strategy, this article does what
most Algerians would not wish to do: imagine their country with
absolutely no oil. By doing this, it is hoped that Algerian politicians
would one day, hopefully in the near future, realize the urgent
need for adopting a new and fresh development approach that is
inherently different from what is currently in place.
Background
What I want to do here is imagine Algeria with no oil reserves.
To partly achieve this, I have followed a straightforward academic
approach: estimate Algerians' living standards on the assumption
of zero oil and then compare them with the actual numbers. The
discrepancy or residual would then be attributed to dependency
on oil proceeds.
This is a simple, but, as the economic literature has shown,
powerful approach. More precisely, the estimates (Table 1 below)
were obtained by first estimating a conventional production function
with capital and labor, in addition to oil proceed, as explanatory
variables, then setting the oil coefficient to zero. Data for
estimation, in 1987 prices, come from the World Bank, World Tables,
1994.
Table 1: Algerians'
Real Average Income With and Without Oil, US Dollars
|
|
With Oil
(actual) (1) |
Without Oil
(estimated) (2) |
Ratio
(1)/(2) |
|
1974-79 |
3, 095 |
840 |
3.68 |
|
1980-85 |
3, 082 |
830 |
3.71 |
|
1986-91 |
2, 045 |
997 |
2.05 |
|
1974-91 |
2, 741 |
889 |
3.08 |
The most striking result to be noted from the table is the
serious deterioration in Algerians' living standards in the zero-oil
case. Thus, in the period 1974-79, average income, as measured
by real GDP per capita, would have been only US$840 as opposed
to the actual US$3,095. This is a significant reduction that represents
a drop of more than 70 percent. Similarly, in 1980-85, Algerians
would have witnessed a sharp decline in their average income,
from US$3,082 to only US$830; a drop of more than US$2,250 in
absolute value. In 1986-91, the gap between the actual GDP per
capita and the estimated one is lower (roughly US$1000), confirming
the hypothesis that the oil-only strategy is to blame for the
post-1986 disaster. On the whole, Algerians' living standards
would have been more than three times lower had Algeria not have
any oil reserves for the period 1974-91.
The Neighborhood
A more attractive exercise would be to compare Algerians'
living standards without oil with their counterparts in Morocco
and Tunisia. This is interesting because many Algerians feel proud
to have always enjoyed higher living standards than the bulk majority
of people in their neighborhood. In the 1970s, in particular,
Algerians attributed their success to Boumedienne's special economic
policies (namely the Agrarian-Cultural-Industrial revolutions);
in the 1980s, they simply felt that the blessing was a gift from
God.
Table 2: Living Standards
in No-Oil Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia
(in 1987 US Dollars)
|
|
Algeria
(estimated) |
Morocco
(actual) |
Tunisia
(actual) |
|
1974-79 |
840 |
1,356 |
2,136 |
|
1980-85 |
830 |
1,047 |
1,664 |
|
1986-91 |
997 |
844 |
1,226 |
|
1974-91 |
889 |
1,082 |
1,675 |
Source: Calculations on
data from the World Bank, World Tables, 1994.
The data in Table 2 is self-explanatory. For example, during
the period 1974-79, Algerians' average income would have been
almost 40 percent lower than that of their Moroccan counterparts
and more than 60 percent lower than that of Tunisians. While for
the period 1980-85, these percentages drop to about 20 percent
and 50 percent, respectively, the gap, evidently, remains significant.
This, however, is not strictly the case with the post-1986 period
where the average income of Algerians is estimated to have been
almost 20 percent higher than that of Moroccans and only about
20 percent lower than that of Tunisians.
On the whole, Algerians' living standards without oil would
have been about 20 percent lower than those of Moroccans and about
45 percent lower than those of Tunisians.
On the other hand, there is a warning. The estimates here
compare Algerians' living standards with those of their Moroccan
and Tunisian counterparts on the assumption of no oil and no manufacturing
sector. If one assumes the existence of a leading manufacturing
sector in Algeria, as it is the case with Tunisia, for example,
then a different conclusion emerges. Algeria has a better qualified
labor force and a larger stock of human capital, thanks to Boumedienne's
free education policy. This, combined with a smart technology
and industrial policy, would have undoubtedly produced an Algerian
miracle. Algeria would have become the small Japan of Africa,
as many Algerians were poised to believe in the late 1970s. Furthermore,
Tunisia appears to take the lead in terms of GDP per capita because
the country itself used to depend on oil proceeds for economic
development. Similarly, for Morocco, one should not forget the
crucial role of the phosphate sector in improving Moroccans' living
standards. Hence, a more meaningful comparison would have been
between Algeria without oil, on the one hand, and Tunisia without
oil and manufacturing, and Morocco without manufacturing and phosphate,
on the other.
Nevertheless the current exercise does give a rough idea
on Algerians' average income without oil, stressing, at the same
time, the role of manufacturing in improving the livelihood of
many people in such countries as Tunisia and Morocco.
Conclusion
Not so many Algerians seem to appreciate the fact that oil
for its own sake is not a virtue. Those who do, namely economists,
can never make it to the presidential palace in Algiers to get
actively involved in designing a meaningful development strategy
that will eventually save the country. The reasons are many, but
the most important of these is the existence of 'barriers to entry.'
In other words, political monopoly exists. But those lucky ones
who manage to get their way into Algeria's White House, they,
as expected, become "so charitable" to their politicians.
They twist their views to tell them what they really want to hear:
pump oil for its own sake, and the IMF, like oil, is a virtue.
It is really a puzzle that with such well-documented shortcomings
of the oil-only strategy, Algerians do not seem to have made any
real progress in minimizing dependency on oil proceeds for economic
development. The reasons, as I argued here and elsewhere, are
many; the most important, undoubtedly, being that Algerian politicians
tend to stick to what they really know best: pumping oil.
If the reader
would like to comment on this editorial, a response to be posted
can be e-mailed to webmaster@djazair.zzn.com, or you can post in the Djazair
Message Boards:
|