Boumedienne's Little Miracle
"Algerians will not go to Heaven with empty
stomachs"
H. Boumedienne
by Abdelaziz Testas, Ph.D.
More
than two decades after his death in 1978, Algeria's president
Houari Boumedienne is still admired by millions of Algerians.
Some admire him for his style and smile; many for his policies.
But those who try to discredit him on shaky political grounds
can be grouped into two main categories: (i) those who argue that
he was no different from his successors, and (ii) those who think
that he had plenty of oil. This article shows that the two groups
are equally wrong.
The Cornerstone of Algeria's Prosperity
Many Algerians do not know why Algeria is not an economic
super power. Yet the answer is simple: Phenomenal growth rates
are missing. Asians in Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Malaysia,
for example, are far richer than us (and than many people in other
developing countries) primarily because they have managed to sustain
high economic growth rates for so long. Similarly, Algerians were
richer under the Boumedienne government in the 1970s than under
Bendjedid in the 1980s because the latter could not sustain high
GDP growth rates Boumedienne had initiated.
A bit of history is always useful. At the eve of his departure
in December 1978, Boumedienne left Algeria with the highest output
growth rate in the country's entire history. He achieved 9 percent.
One year later, in 1979, his policies were still in play producing
another phenomenal growth rate of 7 percent. However, as soon
as Bendjedid detached himself from his predecessor's policies
in 1980, the GDP growth rate plunged to 0.8 percent; a loss of
more than 90 percent of its 1978 value.
The Numbers
The table below computes Algeria's real GDP growth rates
for two periods: One for Boumedienne extending from 1974 to 1979;
the other for Bendjedid stretching from 1980 to 1985. There are
two important qualifications here. First, as a matter of fairness,
I did not intend to blame Bendjedid for the post-1986 disaster
(i.e. world oil price collapse), so I stopped at 1985 (although
another reason is that the IMF runs Algeria). Second, although
Boumedienne died in 1978, I included 1979 as part of his own heritage
because at the time his policies were still in place. In other
words, the 1979 prosperity should not be attributed to his successor.
Table 1: Real GDP Growth
Rates under Boumedienne and Bendjedid
|
Boumedienne |
Bendjedid |
|
1974 |
7.0 |
1980 |
0.8 |
|
1975 |
4.9 |
1981 |
3.1 |
|
1976 |
8.2 |
1982 |
6.3 |
|
1977 |
4.8 |
1983 |
5.3 |
|
1978 |
9.0 |
1984 |
5.7 |
|
1979 |
7.0 |
1985 |
6.0 |
|
Average |
6.8 |
Average |
4.5 |
What the story tells us is probably what everyone would
expect: The average growth rate of Algeria's economy under Bendjedid
did not match that of Boumedienne. In fact, it was almost 35 percent
smaller. Furthermore, Bendjedid never matched Boumedienne's growth
rate of 9 percent in any year from 1980 to 1985; his best record
was only a little higher than 6 percent in 1982. Looking at it
from a different angle, one would find that Boumedienne never
recorded an output growth rate that was as low as 0.8 percent.
Does the difference in growth rates matter? In fact, a great
deal. With a growth rate of 0.8 percent, GDP will double in 90
years; with 9 percent, this will take only 8 years to double (this
is the rule of 72 where the number of years GDP will take to double
is equal to 72 divided by the GDP growth rate). So, one can imagine
the substantial increase in Algerians' living standards Bendjedid
would have achieved had he been able to sustain Boumedienne's
output growth rates.
Or was it because Bendjedid had lower world oil prices?
The answer is no. From 1958 to 1973 crude oil prices were stable
at about US$3 per barrel. In Bendjedid's era, they increased from
US$3 in 1973 to more than US$35 in 1980 (to be fair to Boumedienne,
the 1979 price increase should be added to Bendjedid's bill since
the oil proceeds went to his government's budget). Under Boumedienne's
presidency, from 1974 to 1978, crude oil prices increased at a
moderate pace from US$11 per barrel to US$13 per barrel (in fact,
when adjusted for inflation, the prices even tended to show a
decline).
Table 2: World Oil
Prices, 1974-85
|
Boumedienne |
Bendjedid |
|
1974 |
11.0 |
1980 |
35.9 |
|
1975 |
10.4 |
1981 |
34.3 |
|
1976 |
11.6 |
1982 |
31.8 |
|
1977 |
12.6 |
1983 |
28.7 |
|
1978 |
12.9 |
1984 |
27.5 |
|
1979 |
29.8 |
1985 |
26.5 |
|
Average |
14.7 |
Average |
30.8 |
This leaves us with only one question: Why could Boumedienne
register an average growth rate of 6.8 percent per year while
Bendjedid only a rate of 4.5 percent, although they both had oil?
The answer must be that the former worked harder.
Further Evidence
Houari Boumedienne, with more hard work and less corruption,
managed to sustain not only high GDP growth rates, but also reasonably
high growth rates of GDP per capita. This significantly improved
Algerians' living standards under his presidency. For the period
1974-79, GDP per capita, a rough measure of average income, increased
by 3.8 percent annually. On his departure in 1978, Boumedienne
had already achieved a growth rate as high as 5.5 percent. This
turned out to be the highest Algeria could generate in the entire
period of 1974-85. Furthermore, Bendjedid is to blame for the
dramatic fall in Algerians' living standards under his government.
Thus, in 1980, Algerians witnessed a fall in their incomes by
at least 2.5 percent; in 1981, these stagnated completely as the
income per capita growth rate was nil.
Table 3: Real GDP Per
Capita Growth Rates, 1974-85.
|
Boumedienne |
Bendjedid |
|
1974 |
4.4 |
1980 |
-2.5 |
|
1975 |
1.8 |
1981 |
0.0 |
|
1976 |
5.1 |
1982 |
3.3 |
|
1977 |
1.8 |
1983 |
2.3 |
|
1978 |
5.5 |
1984 |
2.3 |
|
1979 |
4.2 |
1985 |
2.7 |
|
Average |
3.8 |
Average |
1.4 |
As mentioned earlier, it matters a great deal as to whether
GDP per capita increases by 3.8 percent per annum, as it did under
Boumedienne, or by only 1.4 percent, as was the case under Bendjedid.
According to the rule of 72 highlighted above, other things being
equal, an increase of 3.8 percent would mean that our living standards,
something we really care for, would double in less than two decades,
while an increase of 1.4 percent would indicate that this would
take more than half a century (and I will leave it to others to
demonstrate the case of negative growth rates).
Finally, a little exercise may end the story. We estimate
the levels of Algeria's real GDP in AD billions. Bendjedid would
have gained had he managed to sustain Boumedienne's high growth
rates (but, of course, he could not!). The data in Table 4 below
indicates that the numbers are very large.
Table 4: Actual and Estimated
levels of Output Under Bendjedid, AD billion
|
|
Estimated |
Actual |
Estimated/Actual |
|
1980 |
296 |
252 |
117 |
|
1981 |
319 |
260 |
123 |
|
1982 |
343 |
277 |
124 |
|
1983 |
368 |
292 |
126 |
|
1984 |
398 |
309 |
129 |
|
1985 |
430 |
328 |
131 |
|
Total |
2,154 |
1,718 |
125 |
The data in Table 4 tells an interestingly sad story: Had Bendjedid
followed Boumedienne's policies to the fullest, Algeria's GDP
would have been AD 2,154 billion, instead of the actual AD 1,718
billion. This is a loss of more than AD 435 billion for the period
1980-85. In other words, Algeria's GDP would have been, on average,
25 percent higher than it actually was, which is a significant
increase. This, in fact, matches a GDP per capita of about AD
20,000 at the 1985 population level.
The Bottom Line
This article proves two points. First, those who try to
discredit Boukharouba* on shaky political grounds should realize
the fact that it is time they became honest. Although Boumedienne
did share common pitfalls with his successor, by depending on
the oil sector so heavily and following a socialist path, the
man worked smarter.
The issue of smart-working governments is particularly important
to understand Algeria's current political turmoil. At the eve
of the world oil price collapse in 1986, Algeria's GDP growth
rate plunged to -0.6 percent, from 9 percent in 1978. In 1987,
the population hoped for the best, as the rate of growth climbed
to zero; but in 1988, it became convinced that the worst was far
from over as the growth rate plunged to -1.5 percent. In response,
thousands went to the street. In 1989, the IMF (International
Monetary Fund) rushed to help with millions of dollars, increasing
the GDP growth rate to 5.5 percent. This, unfortunately, as one
might have expected, could not be sustained as the GDP growth
rate declined to -1.2 percent in 1990. One year later, in 1991,
Bendjedid tried hard to bring it up to 1.5 percent, but that was
not good enough to save his existence as a president.
The second point, which is probably the most important,
is that Boumedienne's experience is certainly instructive to Algeria's
newly elected president. The message is clear: hard-work and political
stability have become post-Boumedienne Algeria's dream. But there
is one thing Bouteflika needs to unlearn from Boumedienne's heritage:
dependency on oil proceeds and socialism. Had Boumedienne built
his kingdom on large scale capitalistic manufacturing industries,
there is little doubt that his miracle would have been a really
BIG one.
*Mohamed Boukharouba was former president
Boumedienne's real name.
If the reader
would like to comment on this editorial, a response to be posted
can be e-mailed to webmaster@djazair.zzn.com, or you can post in the Djazair
Message Boards:
|